innocence legal team
#1 Child pornography defense law firm in california
Since 1977, we have successfully defended against the falsely accused against Child Molestation, Child Pornography, Rape / Sexual Assault, and Cyber Entrapment / Stings allegations.
If you are unsure of where to start, schedule a virtual consultation.
If you need immediate legal assistance, don’t wait. Contact us immediately.
Since 1973, we have successfully defended the falsely accused against Child Molestation, Child Pornography, Rape / Sexual Assault, and Cyber Entrapment / Stings allegations.
If you are unsure of where to start, schedule a virtual consultation.
If you need immediate legal assistance, don’t wait. Contact us immediately.
Our clients are our best ambassadors
Founder and Chief Strategist:
Patrick Clancy
Patrick Clancy Is a Nationally Known Leader Standing Up to the Excesses of the Group Think Victim Movements of the Last 60-Years From “Child Protection” to “Me Too”
Patrick Clancy was the first person commissioned by The American Bar Association to address false child molestation allegations in an article published by the renowned Criminal Justice Law Review Journal: False Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse: Why is it Happening, What Can We Do, 1990 Criminal Justice 14

Patrick Clancy Is a Nationally Known Leader Standing Up to the Excesses of the Group Think Victim Movements of the Last 60-Years From “Child Protection” to “Me Too”
Patrick Clancy was the first person commissioned by The American Bar Association to address false child molestation allegations in an article published by the renowned Criminal Justice Law Review Journal: False Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse: Why is it Happening, What Can We Do, 1990 Criminal Justice 14
How we win
Successfully Defending Against Child Pornography Allegations
Understanding Criminal Charges: What You Need to Know.

Child Pornography
- Defendant knowingly possessed or controlled any matter, representation of information, data, or image that contained or incorporated in any manner obscene matter involving the use of a person under the age of 18 years.
- Defendant knew that the matter depicted a person under the age of 18 years personally engaging in or simulating sexual conduct.
- Did not know person depicted was under 18.
- Did not possess child pornography.
- Unlawful search and seizure.
- Low: 16 months
- Mid: 2 years
- High Term: 3 years
- Probation Eligibility: Yes
- Possible Professional License revocation/suspension/restriction
- DNA Bank
- Ineligible to vote while incarcerated
- Ineligible to hold public office for life
- Loss of right to serve as juror while incarcerated or on supervision
- Impeachment of testimony possible
- Deportation possible if not US citizen
- Firearm prohibition
- Sex Registration
- Defendant advertised for sale or distribution any obscene matter.
- Defendant had knowledge that the obscene matter depicted a person under the age of 18 years engaging in or personally simulating sexual conduct.
- Did not know person depicted was under 18.
- Did not possess child pornography.
- Unlawful search and seizure.
- Low: 2 Years
- Mid: 3 years
- High Term: 4 years
- Probation Eligibility: Yes
- Possible Professional License revocation/suspension/restriction
- DNA Bank
- Ineligible to vote while incarcerated
- Ineligible to hold public office for life
- Loss of right to serve as juror while incarcerated or on supervision
- Impeachment of testimony possible
- Deportation possible if not US citizen
- Firearm prohibition
- Sex Registration
- Defendant knowingly possessed media depicting a minor[s]engaged in sexually explicit conduct;
- Defendant knew visual depictions contained in the media were of a minor[s] engaged in sexually explicit conduct;
- Defendant knew that production of such visual depictions involved use of a minor in sexually explicit conduct;
- Each visual depiction had been transferred using any means or facility of interstate commerce or affecting interstate commerce.
- Defendant did not possess the depictions.
- The Depictions were not of minors;
- Defendant did not know that the depictions were of minors.
- Defendant did not know the visual depictions were created with the use of minors in sexually explicit conduct;
- The depictions were not transferred in interstate commerce and the transfer did not affect interstate commerce.
- 5 years to 20 years for first-time offense
- Possible Professional License revocation/suspension/restriction
- DNA Bank
- Ineligible to vote while incarcerated
- Ineligible to hold public office for life
- Loss of right to serve as juror while incarcerated or on supervision
- Impeachment of testimony possible
- Deportation possible if not US citizen
- Firearm prohibition
- Sex Registration
A Single Felony Charge Can Lead to Other Litigation Against You.
An accused can be sued civilly for the same conduct alleged in a criminal proceeding. In a civil proceeding you may be required to file statements and give testimony which can be used against you in your criminal case. On the other hand, discovery (such as the deposition of an accuser) in these proceedings not available in criminal court, can provide an unprecedented opportunity for obtaining evidence in your defense.

Civil Court
Alleged victims can also institute civil proceedings against the accused for the recovery of financial losses, pain and suffering and even punitive damages.
Children’s services can initiate proceedings to remove minor children from situations deemed dangerous. Juvenile dependency cases can be life changing for you and your child and so must be taken very seriously. Your testimony may be compelled in such a proceeding and used against you in criminal court for impeachment purposes.

Juvenile Dependency Court
If a charged offense poses a threat to a minor, Children’s Services can initiate proceedings to remove minor children from the care of the accused.
A spouse will often turn against a partner charged with a felony. This can result in proceedings for divorce, custody, child support and restraining orders. Evidence, including your own testimony in such proceedings may be used against you in your criminal case. On the other hand, discovery (such as the deposition of an accuser) in these proceedings not available in criminal court, can provide an unprecedented opportunity for obtaining evidence in your defense.

Family Law Court
A felony charge will often cause a spouse to turn against the accused.
California licensing boards can be quick to take action against a license holder charged with a felony. These include medical, law, pharmacy, dentistry, accounting, architecture, real estate, contractor, and most every other profession and trade. Police and civil servants can face administrative discharge hearings. Evidence, including your own testimony in such proceedings can be used against you in your criminal case. Your testimony may be compelled in such a proceeding and used against you in criminal court for impeachment purposes.

Professional License Administrative Hearings
Without the right strategy you cannot win.
Mistakes today has consequences in the future
Even if you have already had your preliminary hearing, your case is set for trial or even if there has already been a conviction, it may not too late to correct mistakes. Yesterday’s mistakes do not mean that your tomorrows are ruined. Call the Innocence Legal Team today.

Corrective Action
Stop. There is still time to take corrective action. The legal team can often turn a losing strategy into a winning strategy.
Too many times the Innocence Legal Team receives a case late in the process after other counsel have made serious strategic mistakes. Sometimes even after conviction. Nevertheless, the Innocence Legal Team has a long history of turning such cases around by correcting those previous mistakes by instituting the best stratagy.

Prior Attorneys
Too many times prior attorneys have used the wrong strategy and tactics.
Strategy is the roadmap to victory. Patrick Clancy has developed the winning strategy in hundreds of the most complicated and seemingly hopeless criminal cases. The right strategy is the key to prevailing and the Innocence Legal Team thoroughly analyzes all the evidence to determine your best winning strategy.

Strategy
Without the right strategy you cannot win.
Does Hiring a Local Attorney Give You an Advantage with Your Case?
If you want to have the best chance of prevailing, you need the most experienced, skilled, and tenacious team possible. The Innocence Legal Team is your team. Founder Patrick Clancy has gathered the most talented attorneys, paralegals, experts, and investigators in the state to fight for your freedom, reputation, and innocence.

Expertise & Skill
Counsel’s skill, experience and expertise are all that matter.
Knowledge of local politics is almost never relevant to a criminal case. Even in the unlikely event that local counsel may know an important member of the community, there is zero chance that such a figure would intervene on your behalf. No politician is going to risk the exposure of that kind of favoritism.

Local Politics
Local counsel’s claims of knowledge of local politics won’t help you.
Claims of such connections may be a sign of lack of skill, experience, or both. Prosecutors and judges are not going to show favoritism just because they are familiar with your counsel. Such conduct has resulted in well publicized firings and even criminal prosecution of Judges and DA’s. They will not risk their careers and reputations for you.

Judge & Prosecutor Connection Fallacy
Claimed connections by local attorneys with prosecutors and judges won’t help and may even hurt your chances.
We Are Here to Help You now
THE COPS DO NOT WANT YOU TO TALK TO US UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.
The cops don’t want to “talk” to you; they only want to interrogate you. They do not care about fairness. They do not care if you are innocent. To cops, everyone is guilty. To them, there is no such thing as a false allegation.
A MISTAKE MADE IN A MINUTE CAN RUIN YOUR ENTIRE LIFE.
Don’t wait until there is a knock on the door.
Fill out this form to get the help and advice you need NOW.